Study Hub
Your cross-module control center. The streak only counts days where you complete at least one Daily challenge. The personal deck uses the same SM-2 algorithm taught in Spaced Repetition — the technique that powers the hub powers itself.
Today's mission · 0/5
Personal review deck (SM-2 scheduled)
⭐ a card in any module — it lands hereReviews keep your starred cards alive by scheduling each one for the day it would have started to fade.
Your deck (0)
Cross-module final exam
25 questions · 5 per module · randomizedThe full test of everything taught in the 5 modules. 5 questions are drawn from each module's quiz bank in random order. Try to finish without consulting Learn — that's retrieval practice applied to itself.
Teacher portal
course pack · rubrics · printable bundles4-week course pack
Print-ready outline below. Each week pairs one of the 5 study-skills modules with a hands-on practice block. Designed for one 45-min class session per topic, with daily 10-min retrieval homework in between.
Worksheet bundle
Each module's Teacher view has a 10-question worksheet with answer key. The links below open each module directly to its Teacher tab — use "Regenerate questions" to get a fresh shuffled copy, then "Print worksheet".
Cross-module rubric
Use to evaluate students' integrated study practice. Each row scored 0–4 = 24 total.
- Memory: can demonstrate at least two encoding techniques (palace + one other) on assigned material.
- Spaced repetition: shows a working schedule (paper or app) and a mature card > 21-day interval.
- Active recall: can blurt one week's material with ≥ 60% of key points recalled.
- Feynman: can deliver a 4-step pass aloud with no hand-waving in step 4.
- Note-taking: Cornell or comparable system used during a real lecture (artifact submitted).
- Integration: can describe how each module feeds the next without prompting.
Key research
- Ebbinghaus (1885) — Forgetting curve.
- Roediger & Karpicke (2006) — Testing effect, +33% retention at 1 week.
- Karpicke & Blunt (2011) — Retrieval > concept mapping.
- Dunlosky et al. (2013) — Practice testing + distributed practice rated HIGH utility.
- Mueller & Oppenheimer (2014) — Laptop typists encode less than handwriters.
- Rozenblit & Keil (2002) — Illusion of explanatory depth.
- Cowan (2001) — Working memory capacity ≈ 4 ± 1.